header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Shaw v Remploy Ltd [2009] All ER (D) 294 (Jul)

Regulation 15 of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/752) encouraged grievance procedures to happen, but it was of utility only once. It did nothing more than provide an extension of time from three to six months in an unfair dismissal case. It did not depend upon there being a procedure in place, but only upon the reasonable belief in the mind of the employee. It was limited to a moment in time, namely, the time the primary limitation period expired. If the claimant had that reasonable belief, she would get an extension of time in which to bring a claim. It was plainly envisaged that three months was sufficient for any internal procedure to be exhausted.

Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll