header-logo header-logo

Employment

06 August 2009
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Shaw v Remploy Ltd [2009] All ER (D) 294 (Jul)

Regulation 15 of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/752) encouraged grievance procedures to happen, but it was of utility only once. It did nothing more than provide an extension of time from three to six months in an unfair dismissal case. It did not depend upon there being a procedure in place, but only upon the reasonable belief in the mind of the employee. It was limited to a moment in time, namely, the time the primary limitation period expired. If the claimant had that reasonable belief, she would get an extension of time in which to bring a claim. It was plainly envisaged that three months was sufficient for any internal procedure to be exhausted.

Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll