header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

European Community

Dias v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] EWCA Civ 807, [2009] All ER (D) 358 (Jul)

The following questions have been referred to the European Court of Justice:
(i) “If a European Union citizen, present in a Member State of which she is not a national, was, prior to the transposition of Council Directive (EC) 2004/38, the holder of a residence permit validly issued pursuant to art 4(2) of Council Directive (EEC) 68/360, but was for a period of time during the currency of the permit voluntarily unemployed, not self-sufficient and outside the qualifications for the issue of such a permit, did that person by reason only of her possession of the permit, remain during that time someone who ‘resided legally’ in the host Member State for the purpose of later acquiring a permanent right of residence under art 16(1) of Directive 2004/38”

(ii) “If five years’ continuous residence as a worker prior to 30 April 2006 does not qualify to give rise to the permanent right of residence created by art 16(1) of Directive 2004/38, does such continuous residence as a worker give rise to a permanent right of residence directly pursuant to art 18(1) of the EU Treaty on the grounds that there is a lacuna in the Directive?”

Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll