header-logo header-logo

29 July 2020
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 31 July 2020

Contempt of court

Atkinson and another v Varma and others [2020] EWHC 1868 (Ch), [2020] All ER (D) 106 (Jul)

The applicant liquidators’ application to commit the first respondent (V) to prison for contempt of court succeeded. The Chancery Division held that, among other things, V had made false statements in affidavits and witness statements, and he had failed to inform the liquidators of the existence of relevant assets, in breach of an earlier order.


Criminal law

R v RN [2020] EWCA Crim 937, [2020] All ER (D) 109 (Jul)

In allowing the appellant’s appeal against her conviction on the basis of a reconsideration of the verdict by the jury, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, held, that the present had not been a clear-cut instance of a jury indicating that there had been a mistake in the way that the verdicts had been delivered, with that indication being provided promptly and the matter being resolved in circumstances which excluded the possibility of any further deliberations and a change of mind.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll