header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Law Digest: 18 January 2008

Wills

Kostic v Chaplin [2007] EWHC 2909 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 119 (Dec)

 

The costs of a contentious probate action are within the discretion of the court, applying CPR Pts 43 and 44. The general rule (CPR 44.3(2)(a)) is that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party. In contentious probate actions, however, two long-established exceptions have survived the introduction of the CPR: (i) if a person who made a will, or people who are interested in the residue, have been the cause of the litigation, a case is made out for the costs to come out of the estate; and (ii) if the circumstances lead, reasonably, to an investigation of the matter, the costs could be left to be borne by those who had incurred them.

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll