header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Judicial review

Ogango v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2008] All ER (D) 230 (Nov)

Reasons given by any tribunal for reaching a decision should be intelligible and adequate, and should meet the substance of the arguments advanced by the parties.

A tribunal has to show that is has successfully grasped the main contentions advanced by the parties and tell them in broad terms why they have lost or won.

Issue: 7348 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll