header-logo header-logo

Legal profession

04 December 2008
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Salsbury v Law Society [2008] EWCA Civ 1285, [2008] All ER (D) 240 (Nov)

In applying the principles set out in Bolton v Law Society [1994] 1WLR 512, [1994] 2 All ER 486, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) must take into account the rights of the solicitor under Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

It is an overstatement to say that “a very strong case” is required before the court will interfere with the sentence imposed by the SDT.
Absent any error of law, the High Court must pay considerable respect to the sentencing decisions of the tribunal.

However, if the court is satisfied that the sentencing decision was clearly inappropriate, the court will interfere (see Law reports, p 1,720).

Issue: 7348 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll