header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 4 September 2020

02 September 2020
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Adoption

R (on the application of Article 39) v Secretary of State for Education [2020] EWHC 2184 (Admin), [2020] All ER (D) 40 (Aug)

The claimant children’s rights charity unsuccessfully challenged the Adoption and Children (Coronavirus) Amendment Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/445) which amended a series of regulatory protections in respect of children social care services. The Administrative Court held that given the circumstances, there had not been an error of law in the consultation process. Nor had the 2020 Regulations exercised the statutory power in a way that had failed to promote the policy and objects of the statutes in question.


Divorce

S v C [2020] EWHC 2127 (Fam), [2020] All ER (D) 43 (Aug)

In the course of proceedings concerning financial provision following the parties’ divorce, the court had to decide to what extent it should exercise its jurisdiction under s 23 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 so as to impose conditions on the release to the parties of a frozen fund of some £3.74m. The provenance of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll