header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Case law , Procedure & practice , Law digest , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282, [2007] All ER (D) 61 (Dec)

An insurance policy contained a clause stating that it was to be governed by laws of New York, and an arbitration clause which provided that any dispute arising under the policy was to be determined in London, under the provisions of the English Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996). It was held that by choosing as the seat of the arbitration, the parties must be taken to have agreed that proceedings on the award should be only those permitted by English law; any challenges to an award are therefore confined to those permitted by AA 1996.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll