header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Case law , Procedure & practice , Law digest , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282, [2007] All ER (D) 61 (Dec)

An insurance policy contained a clause stating that it was to be governed by laws of New York, and an arbitration clause which provided that any dispute arising under the policy was to be determined in London, under the provisions of the English Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996). It was held that by choosing as the seat of the arbitration, the parties must be taken to have agreed that proceedings on the award should be only those permitted by English law; any challenges to an award are therefore confined to those permitted by AA 1996.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—David Vaughan

Shakespeare Martineau—David Vaughan

Shakespeare Martineau appoints new London office head as firm continues investment in capital

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson strengthens All-Island life sciences platform with appointment of leading Galway MedTech lawyer

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

National law firm strengthens commercial offering with acquisition of leading immigration practice

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners
back-to-top-scroll