header-logo header-logo

22 April 2026
Issue: 8158 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Consumer
printer mail-detail

Fallout escalates from collapsed firm

A ‘sophisticated suspected fraud’ may have taken place at PM Law involving the improper removal and misuse of about £39.5m of client funds, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed

PM Law, which collapsed in February, comprised a group of 11 companies, 25 offices and more than 30 trading names spread across Yorkshire, Cumbria, Berkshire, Derbyshire and London.

In an update this week, the SRA said its intervention was ‘one of the largest and most complex ever undertaken’. It is supporting thousands of former clients and handling hundreds of claims to the SRA Compensation Fund, amounting to an estimated £21.5m—although this figure may increase. As of the end of last week, it had paid out £9.3m from the fund plus £6.8m from money held within the firm.

Paul Hastings, SRA director of client protection, said: ‘Some of those affected were in the process of buying or selling a home, facing the risk of collapsed moves, or losing their deposits.

‘Others were dealing with delayed probate matters, often while managing bereavement and outstanding estate administration. Many of the former clients faced significant upheaval at a stressful time.’

Law Society chief executive officer Ian Jeffery said: ‘The SRA has moved quickly in its investigation and has already paid out 92 claims to former clients.

‘We continue to be encouraged that the SRA has acted with openness and transparency. However, a case this large coming so soon after Axiom Ince and SSB Group, reinforces the need for the SRA to focus on their core regulatory role and deliver the changes needed to reduce the risk of future large-scale collapses and re-build consumer confidence.

‘The Compensation Fund provides crucial protection and reassurance to consumers. It is unfortunate the SRA has had to use the Fund in this case and we hope any increase to the Fund will be kept to a minimum.’

Issue: 8158 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Consumer
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Private client department announces partner hire

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Firm appoints first joint heads of Wales office

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Global dispute resolution team promotes two partners in Guernsey and Cayman Islands

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll