header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

SENTENCING

R v Gordon and others [2007] EWCA Crim 165

The Criminal Justice Act 1967, s 67 continues to apply to sentences of imprisonment imposed in relation to offences committed before 4 April 2005; offences committed on or after 4 April 2005 are governed by the Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 240, so that the court has to order a
reduction for time spent in custody on remand.

Where s 240 applies, once the court has decided that credit should be given, it should say so, and is entitled to adjourn for appropriate information to be provided about the relevant number of days. If the calculation has not been made, or the court is uncertain about the time served, but considers that, in principle, the time spent in custody should be treated as time served, the court might properly direct that the period will be deducted after the appropriate calculation has been made, and adjourn that part of the process.

Thereafter, the calculation should be made promptly and the final decision should, save in exceptional circumstances, be concluded within 28 days. However, even if delayed beyond that period, it is permissible for the crown court to deal with what is no more than the final implementation of its order.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll