header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

SENTENCING

R v Gordon and others [2007] EWCA Crim 165

The Criminal Justice Act 1967, s 67 continues to apply to sentences of imprisonment imposed in relation to offences committed before 4 April 2005; offences committed on or after 4 April 2005 are governed by the Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 240, so that the court has to order a
reduction for time spent in custody on remand.

Where s 240 applies, once the court has decided that credit should be given, it should say so, and is entitled to adjourn for appropriate information to be provided about the relevant number of days. If the calculation has not been made, or the court is uncertain about the time served, but considers that, in principle, the time spent in custody should be treated as time served, the court might properly direct that the period will be deducted after the appropriate calculation has been made, and adjourn that part of the process.

Thereafter, the calculation should be made promptly and the final decision should, save in exceptional circumstances, be concluded within 28 days. However, even if delayed beyond that period, it is permissible for the crown court to deal with what is no more than the final implementation of its order.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll