header-logo header-logo

Sentencing

29 November 2007
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (O’Connell) v Parole Board [2007] EWHC 2591 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 205 (Nov

The defendant had been given an extended sentence under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 227. Under s 247, a prisoner has to satisfy the Parole Board that it is no longer necessary for the protection of the public for him to remain in custody for the second half of the custodial period before he is entitled to release.

The Parole Board’s decision as to whether or not to direct release, which is critical to the prisoner’s entitlement to release after he has served half of the custodial period, must be compliant with of the European Convention on Human Rights, Art 5(4). However, Art 5(4) does not require an oral hearing in every case where the question is the assessment of risk to the public. Whether or not an oral hearing is necessary depends on the facts of the case.

The Parole Board should be pre-disposed to hold an oral hearing, especially where there is any dispute of fact, or any need to examine the prisoner’s motives or state of mind.

Issue: 7299 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll