header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Trusts

Nelson v Greening and Sykes (Builders) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1358, [2007] All ER (D) 270 (Dec)

Nelson v Greening and Sykes (Builders) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1358, [2007] All ER (D) 270 (Dec)

Where a person who is the owner beneficially of property—and the legal estate is vested in another as trustee for him—makes a declaration of trust, the practical effect amounts, or is capable of amounting, to the “getting rid of ” a trust or equitable interest then subsisting. This is not the same as saying that as a matter of law, it does get rid of the intermediate trust. Rather, in the case of a trust and sub-trust of personal property, the trustees may decide that as a matter of practicality, it is more convenient to deal directly with the beneficiary of the sub-trust.

The court added that authorities on trusts of personal property have no application to a case where the trust property is the purchaser’s interest in land created by the existence of an executory contract for sale and purchase.

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll