header-logo header-logo

Health and Safety

26 July 2007
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v P Ltd [2007] All ER (D) 173 (Jul)

In considering whether there has been neglect within the meaning of s 37(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 on the part of a particular director or other officer, the issue is whether he failed to take some steps to prevent the commission of an offence by the company if the taking of those steps expressly fell or should be held to fall within the scope of the functions his office.

The question is whether, if there had not been actual knowledge of the relevant state of facts, nevertheless the officer of the company should have, by reason of the surrounding circumstances, been put on enquiry as to whether or not the appropriate safety procedures were in place. That would depend on the evidence in every case.

Issue: 7283 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll