header-logo header-logo

REVENUE LAW

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v William Grant & Sons Distillers Ltd; Small (Inspector of Taxes) v Mars UK Ltd [2007] UKHL 15, [2007] 2 All ER 440

Where the depreciation in fixed assets which related to the production of goods sold during the year or in assets which were not used for production has been deducted from revenue in the profit and loss account, s 74(1)(f) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 does not require that, in computing profits for tax purposes, the depreciation in fixed assets which relate to the production of unsold stocks carried forward as part of the cost of unsold stocks should be added back.

The relevant accounting standard lays down a general requirement that the year’s depreciation shown in the balance sheet should be deducted in that year’s profit and loss account but makes an exception whereby it is permissible to carry forward an appropriate part of the depreciation as part of the cost of stocks, to be deducted as and when the stocks are sold in a future year.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll