header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

R v M (No 2) [2007] EWCA Crim 970, [2007] All ER (D) 258 (Apr)

Although rulings made in the course of preparatory hearings should normally continue throughout the trial, they are not immutable. If the interests of justice as a whole so require, a ruling at a preparatory hearing might be changed.

Although a Crown Court judge cannot vary or reverse any ruling consequent on the decision of the Court of Appeal merely because he disagrees or believes it to be wrong, the jurisdiction under s 31(11) of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 does not expire just because the ruling in question was made by the Court of Appeal.

If a ruling made at a preparatory hearing is overturned on appeal but the Court of Appeal differently constituted in a subsequent case holds that the earlier case was decided per incuriam, the judge is bound to follow the later decision, since any rulings of law made at preparatory hearings must correctly reflect the law which will govern the trial.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll