header-logo header-logo

Criminal Litigation

17 May 2007
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v M (No 2) [2007] EWCA Crim 970, [2007] All ER (D) 258 (Apr)

Although rulings made in the course of preparatory hearings should normally continue throughout the trial, they are not immutable. If the interests of justice as a whole so require, a ruling at a preparatory hearing might be changed.

Although a Crown Court judge cannot vary or reverse any ruling consequent on the decision of the Court of Appeal merely because he disagrees or believes it to be wrong, the jurisdiction under s 31(11) of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 does not expire just because the ruling in question was made by the Court of Appeal.

If a ruling made at a preparatory hearing is overturned on appeal but the Court of Appeal differently constituted in a subsequent case holds that the earlier case was decided per incuriam, the judge is bound to follow the later decision, since any rulings of law made at preparatory hearings must correctly reflect the law which will govern the trial.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Firm launches business immigration practice with dual partner hire

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Scottish offering strengthened with dispute resolution partner hire in Glasgow

NEWS
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
back-to-top-scroll