header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Contract

Tandrin Aviation Holdings Ltd v Aero Toy Store LLC and another [2010] EWHC 40 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 111 (Jan)

A clause providing for liquidated damages was enforceable if it did not exceed a genuine attempt to estimate in advance the loss which a claimant would be likely to suffer from a breach of the obligation in question. It was for the court to construe the clause to find out whether the payment stipulated was in truth a penalty or liquidated damages.

The authorities suggested various tests such as: if the sum stipulated for was for an extravagant and unconscionable amount in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach, it was likely to be a penalty. It was no obstacle to the sum stipulated being a genuine pre-estimate of damage, that the consequences of the breach were such as to make precise pre-estimation almost impossible.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll