header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil procedure

Lombard North Central PLC v Automobile World (UK) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 20, [2010] All ER (D) 166 (Jan)

It was a basic principle of the system of civil procedure that the factual case the parties sought to asset at trial had ordinarily to be set out in their statements of case. That was not a principle based on mere formalism.

It was essential to the conduct of a fair trial that each side should know in advance what case the other was making and thus what case it had to meet and prepare for. It was the function of the pleadings to provide that information. The principle applied as much to litigants in person as to lawyers.

There was no duty on a judge trying a civil claim to check with a litigant in person to inquire as to whether such a litigant in person wished to amend his pleadings to raise any particular issues that he had not pleaded. It was for the litigant to decide what case he wished to make and how to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll