header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

Byers and others v Yacht Bull Corporation and another[2010] EWHC 133 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 217 (Feb)

The exception regarding “proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies” contained in Art 1(2)(b) of Council Regulation 44/2001 (the Brussels Regulation) did not apply so as to exclude the application of the Regulation as a whole.

If decisions relating to bankruptcy and winding-up were to be excluded from the scope of the Regulation, it was necessary that they had to derive directly from the bankruptcy or winding-up and be closely connected with the proceedings for “the liquidation des biens” or the “reglement judiciaire”.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll