header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Issue: 7436 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

H v W (divorce; jurisdiction) [2010] All ER (D) 70 (Sep)

Under Art 19 of Council Regulation 2201/2003 (EC) (concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility), for a court to remain seised, there had to be existing proceedings before it. To construe Art 19 in any other way would be a nonsense, as a court could not be seised of a matter about which it could do nothing, unless a party applied to revive the provision.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis will mark the 80th anniversary of Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law with a live podcast exploring the evolution of aviation law from the Chicago Convention to the challenges facing modern aerospace, taking place on Tuesday 29 September
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Foreign judgment creditors have gained a route to recovery after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Drelle v Servis-Terminal
Surrogacy is growing in popularity, but parents-to-be face a complex legal framework
Winning a judgment may be only the beginning of an expensive enforcement battle, writes Professor Dominic Regan in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll