header-logo header-logo

Family law

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-detail

RK and another v United Kingdom [2008] All ER (D) 143 (Oct)

In deciding whether or not interference with the right to respect for family life is “necessary”, the court has to consider whether, in the light of the case as a whole, the reasons adduced to justify the measures are “relevant and sufficient”, and whether the decision-making process was fair and afforded due respect to the interests safeguarded by Art 8.

In the context of care proceedings, mistaken judgments or assessments by professionals do not per se render childcare measures incompatible with the requirements of Art 8. The authorities, medical and social, cannot be held liable every time genuine and reasonably-held concerns about the safety of children are proved, retrospectively, to have been misguided.
 

Issue: 7342 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Law students and graduates can now apply to qualify as solicitors and barristers with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll