header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Law digest: Employment law

Noor v Home Office [2008] All ER (D) 63 (Dec) (EAT)

The effects of an illness or disability can have an increasingly adverse effect on an employee, but once a tribunal has determined that the impairment did not have a substantial adverse effect on an employee’s ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities, there would have to be an appreciable difference in the facts relating to the adverse effects to prevent issue estoppel applying in the future.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll