header-logo header-logo

01 July 2022
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 1 July 2022

Contempt of Court

North Bristol NHS Trust v White [2022] EWHC 1313 (QB), [2022] All ER (D) 02 (Jun)

The Queen’s Bench Division allowed the claimant’s claim for committal for contempt. The claim arose out of an earlier clinical negligence claim brought by the defendant against the claimant. The defendant alleged that the claimant had been negligent by failing to refer her for a neurosurgical assessment and further asserted that had that referral taken place she would have been offered a spinal operation within 48 hours which would have frozen her symptoms in time and prevented any further deterioration. The claimant instructed surveillance agents to video the defendant. That surveillance showed the defendant walking around a number of stores without any apparent limp, slowness or disability. She drove to and from those stores, getting in and out of her car freely and easily. It was apparent to any objective observer of those videos that the defendant’s complaints made to various medical and other experts and reproduced in the experts reports, signed by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll