header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 1 March 2024

Costs

Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2024] EWCA Civ 100, [2024] All ER (D) 47 (Feb)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on the parties’ application for costs following an appeal made in connection with Family Division proceedings. The respondent had made an unusual application for costs in circumstances where the appeal had been successful in the appellant’s favour. The respondent grounded her claims on the appellant’s litigation misconduct which, she claimed, included the increase of the time estimated for the appeal hearing by half a day to accommodate the appellant’s numerous unmeritorious, ancillary applications. The appellant’s claims for costs, on the other hand, were grounded on the basis that he had been successful in the appeal and had achieved a much better outcome. The court held that while a costs application related to appeals in Family Division proceedings was an exception to the general rule that costs follow the event by reason of CPR 44.2(3)(a), that rule could not be applied in the present case. The respondent had failed to resist the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll