header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 1 March 2024

Costs

Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2024] EWCA Civ 100, [2024] All ER (D) 47 (Feb)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on the parties’ application for costs following an appeal made in connection with Family Division proceedings. The respondent had made an unusual application for costs in circumstances where the appeal had been successful in the appellant’s favour. The respondent grounded her claims on the appellant’s litigation misconduct which, she claimed, included the increase of the time estimated for the appeal hearing by half a day to accommodate the appellant’s numerous unmeritorious, ancillary applications. The appellant’s claims for costs, on the other hand, were grounded on the basis that he had been successful in the appeal and had achieved a much better outcome. The court held that while a costs application related to appeals in Family Division proceedings was an exception to the general rule that costs follow the event by reason of CPR 44.2(3)(a), that rule could not be applied in the present case. The respondent had failed to resist the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll