header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 1 March 2024

Costs

Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2024] EWCA Civ 100, [2024] All ER (D) 47 (Feb)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on the parties’ application for costs following an appeal made in connection with Family Division proceedings. The respondent had made an unusual application for costs in circumstances where the appeal had been successful in the appellant’s favour. The respondent grounded her claims on the appellant’s litigation misconduct which, she claimed, included the increase of the time estimated for the appeal hearing by half a day to accommodate the appellant’s numerous unmeritorious, ancillary applications. The appellant’s claims for costs, on the other hand, were grounded on the basis that he had been successful in the appeal and had achieved a much better outcome. The court held that while a costs application related to appeals in Family Division proceedings was an exception to the general rule that costs follow the event by reason of CPR 44.2(3)(a), that rule could not be applied in the present case. The respondent had failed to resist the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll