header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 1 March 2024

Costs

Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2024] EWCA Civ 100, [2024] All ER (D) 47 (Feb)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on the parties’ application for costs following an appeal made in connection with Family Division proceedings. The respondent had made an unusual application for costs in circumstances where the appeal had been successful in the appellant’s favour. The respondent grounded her claims on the appellant’s litigation misconduct which, she claimed, included the increase of the time estimated for the appeal hearing by half a day to accommodate the appellant’s numerous unmeritorious, ancillary applications. The appellant’s claims for costs, on the other hand, were grounded on the basis that he had been successful in the appeal and had achieved a much better outcome. The court held that while a costs application related to appeals in Family Division proceedings was an exception to the general rule that costs follow the event by reason of CPR 44.2(3)(a), that rule could not be applied in the present case. The respondent had failed to resist the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll