header-logo header-logo

01 November 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 1 November 2024

Disclosure

Harrington & Charles Trading ­Company Ltd (In Liquidation) and others v Mehta and others [2024] EWHC 2674 (Ch)

The claimants obtained a worldwide freezing order against the family defendants in relation to an alleged fraud claim. The family defendants disclosed assets worth around $146m, including over $90m in receivables from an individual called Mr Ahli (the Ahli receivables). The first defendant, Jatin, entered into a third-party funding agreement to fund his Indian legal proceedings, with payments routed through an intermediary called Shouq Al Kathiri. The claimants were concerned about the lack of transparency around the Ahli receivables, the third-party funding agreement, and the use of Shouq Al Kathiri as an intermediary.

The court ordered limited disclosure in relation to the Indian legal proceedings, including: an affidavit from Jatin detailing how he funded the proceedings and any payments made, including through Shouq Al Kathiri; disclosure of the third-party funding agreement, subject to confidentiality restrictions; copies of Jatin’s client ledgers and office account ledgers from the Indian legal representatives; and information from Jatin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll