header-logo header-logo

01 November 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 1 November 2024

Disclosure

Harrington & Charles Trading ­Company Ltd (In Liquidation) and others v Mehta and others [2024] EWHC 2674 (Ch)

The claimants obtained a worldwide freezing order against the family defendants in relation to an alleged fraud claim. The family defendants disclosed assets worth around $146m, including over $90m in receivables from an individual called Mr Ahli (the Ahli receivables). The first defendant, Jatin, entered into a third-party funding agreement to fund his Indian legal proceedings, with payments routed through an intermediary called Shouq Al Kathiri. The claimants were concerned about the lack of transparency around the Ahli receivables, the third-party funding agreement, and the use of Shouq Al Kathiri as an intermediary.

The court ordered limited disclosure in relation to the Indian legal proceedings, including: an affidavit from Jatin detailing how he funded the proceedings and any payments made, including through Shouq Al Kathiri; disclosure of the third-party funding agreement, subject to confidentiality restrictions; copies of Jatin’s client ledgers and office account ledgers from the Indian legal representatives; and information from Jatin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll