header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 1 September 2023

01 September 2023
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Appeal

BF v LE [2023] EWHC 2009 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 78 (Aug)

The High Court, Family Division, dismissed the appellant’s (B) claim to have a consent order set aside. Financial remedy proceedings commenced in 2018 where B made a witness statement alleging domestic abuse by the defendant husband. The consent order was signed by both parties and their legal representatives. It fell to be decided whether (i) B had lacked capacity at the material time of the final hearing and the signing of the order and; (ii) there should have been participatory directions/special measures in force pursuant to CPR PD 3AA and FPR, Part 3A. The court held that both grounds should have been raised on appeal. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 created a presumption in favour of capacity: therefore, there was no error in the previous decisions of district courts. Further, the fact that B had raised the allegations of domestic abuse before the final hearing, and that she might have benefited from special measures, did not lead

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll