header-logo header-logo

10 March 2023
Issue: 8016 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 10 March 2023

Citizenship

Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] Lexis Citation 393, [2023] All ER (D) 70 (Feb)

The Special Immigration Appeals Commission dismissed the appellant’s appeal under s 2B of the Special Immigration Appeals Act 1997 against the respondent, the Secretary of State. The appellant’s appeal was about fundamental principles, rights and obligations. She alleged, among other things, that (i) the respondent’s decision to deprive her of her British citizenship was in breach of the UK’s obligation under s 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 with reference to Art 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), because there was at the very least a credible suspicion that she had been trafficked; (ii) the deprivation decision rendered her de facto stateless; and (iii) the deprivation decision was procedurally unfair, irrational and disproportionate under common law and Art 8 of the ECHR. The court held, among other things, that it was unable to accept that there had been a relevant breach of the investigative duty by the respondent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll