header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 11 February 2022

11 February 2022
Issue: 7966 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

CW v CH [2022] EWFC 1, All ER (D) 28 (Jan)

The Family Court, allowed the applications for interim periodical payments and costs allowance in respect of legal fees brought by the claimant, CW, against her former husband, CH, the respondent. The claimant had brought an application for financial relief under the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 Part III (MFPA 1984) following a foreign divorce between her and the respondent. The respondent, argued that the applicant’s application should be dismissed as it was devoid of merit. The court held, among other things, that under ss 13 and 14 of the MFPA 1984, where leave had been granted by the court, and it had been shown that the applicant or any child of the family was in immediate need of financial assistance, the court could make an interim order for maintenance requiring the other party to the marriage to make to the applicant, or to the child, such periodical payments. Further, although the marital standard of living had been an important

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll