header-logo header-logo

11 February 2022
Issue: 7966 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 11 February 2022

Family proceedings

CW v CH [2022] EWFC 1, All ER (D) 28 (Jan)

The Family Court, allowed the applications for interim periodical payments and costs allowance in respect of legal fees brought by the claimant, CW, against her former husband, CH, the respondent. The claimant had brought an application for financial relief under the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 Part III (MFPA 1984) following a foreign divorce between her and the respondent. The respondent, argued that the applicant’s application should be dismissed as it was devoid of merit. The court held, among other things, that under ss 13 and 14 of the MFPA 1984, where leave had been granted by the court, and it had been shown that the applicant or any child of the family was in immediate need of financial assistance, the court could make an interim order for maintenance requiring the other party to the marriage to make to the applicant, or to the child, such periodical payments. Further, although the marital standard of living had been an important

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll