header-logo header-logo

11 February 2022
Issue: 7966 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 11 February 2022

Family proceedings

CW v CH [2022] EWFC 1, All ER (D) 28 (Jan)

The Family Court, allowed the applications for interim periodical payments and costs allowance in respect of legal fees brought by the claimant, CW, against her former husband, CH, the respondent. The claimant had brought an application for financial relief under the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 Part III (MFPA 1984) following a foreign divorce between her and the respondent. The respondent, argued that the applicant’s application should be dismissed as it was devoid of merit. The court held, among other things, that under ss 13 and 14 of the MFPA 1984, where leave had been granted by the court, and it had been shown that the applicant or any child of the family was in immediate need of financial assistance, the court could make an interim order for maintenance requiring the other party to the marriage to make to the applicant, or to the child, such periodical payments. Further, although the marital standard of living had been an important

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll