header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 November 2021
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 12 November 2021

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Costs

R (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health & Social Care; Good Law Project Ltd v Bell [2021] EWHC 2783 (TCC), [2021] All ER (D) 103 (Oct)

The Technology and Construction Court considered the costs of a disclosure application, brought by the claimant company not-for-profit organisation, which related to email correspondence of the respondent professor of medicine in relation to the engagement of the interested party (Abingdon) by the defendant Secretary of State. The Secretary of State had awarded certain contracts to Abingdon for the manufacture and supply of rapid COVID-19 antibody tests during the COVID-19 pandemic and the claimant had challenged those contract awards, among other things, as being contrary to the Public Contract Regulations 2015 (SI 2015/102). In a previous hearing, it had been directed that in order for the court to consider the matter fairly, an application for third-party disclosure should be made against the professor. In the present proceedings, the court held, in considering CPR Pt 46.1(3)(a), that the justice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll