header-logo header-logo

12 November 2021
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 12 November 2021

Costs

R (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health & Social Care; Good Law Project Ltd v Bell [2021] EWHC 2783 (TCC), [2021] All ER (D) 103 (Oct)

The Technology and Construction Court considered the costs of a disclosure application, brought by the claimant company not-for-profit organisation, which related to email correspondence of the respondent professor of medicine in relation to the engagement of the interested party (Abingdon) by the defendant Secretary of State. The Secretary of State had awarded certain contracts to Abingdon for the manufacture and supply of rapid COVID-19 antibody tests during the COVID-19 pandemic and the claimant had challenged those contract awards, among other things, as being contrary to the Public Contract Regulations 2015 (SI 2015/102). In a previous hearing, it had been directed that in order for the court to consider the matter fairly, an application for third-party disclosure should be made against the professor. In the present proceedings, the court held, in considering CPR Pt 46.1(3)(a), that the justice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll