header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 13 June 2025

13 June 2025
Issue: 8120 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

CAFI (Commodity & Freight Integrators) DMCC v GTCS Trading DMCC [2025] EWHC 1350 (Comm)

The Commercial Court allowed the claimant buyer (CAFI’s) challenges, to a Grain and Feed Trade Association (GAFTA) Appeal Award made under ss 67 (substantive jurisdiction), 68 (serious procedural irregularity) and 69 (appeal on a point of law) of the Arbitration Act 1996. The defendant (GTCS), as seller of a cargo of Russian milling wheat, had brought an arbitration claim for damages against CAFI for breach of two contracts. The claim was rejected but overturned on appeal. The court determined that the GAFTA Appeal Board erred in finding it had no jurisdiction to interpret the terms of a second contract between the parties and how it impacted their rights and liabilities under the first contract. This error led to the Board exceeding its jurisdiction by holding CAFI liable for damages. The court also granted leave to appeal on a point of law regarding the Board’s approach to determining whether liability for damages had been waived.


Costs

Willis

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll