header-logo header-logo

13 June 2025
Issue: 8120 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 13 June 2025

Arbitration

CAFI (Commodity & Freight Integrators) DMCC v GTCS Trading DMCC [2025] EWHC 1350 (Comm)

The Commercial Court allowed the claimant buyer (CAFI’s) challenges, to a Grain and Feed Trade Association (GAFTA) Appeal Award made under ss 67 (substantive jurisdiction), 68 (serious procedural irregularity) and 69 (appeal on a point of law) of the Arbitration Act 1996. The defendant (GTCS), as seller of a cargo of Russian milling wheat, had brought an arbitration claim for damages against CAFI for breach of two contracts. The claim was rejected but overturned on appeal. The court determined that the GAFTA Appeal Board erred in finding it had no jurisdiction to interpret the terms of a second contract between the parties and how it impacted their rights and liabilities under the first contract. This error led to the Board exceeding its jurisdiction by holding CAFI liable for damages. The court also granted leave to appeal on a point of law regarding the Board’s approach to determining whether liability for damages had been waived.


Costs

Willis

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll