header-logo header-logo

14 August 2026
Issue: 8174 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 14 August 2026

Company

Re TG Jones High Street Ltd [2026] EWHC 2079 (Ch)

The Chancery Division sanctioned two restructuring plans proposed by the plan companies, TG Jones High Street Ltd and TG Jones Retail Holdings Ltd pursuant to Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006. The applicant plan companies, which operated a high street retail business, faced severe financial difficulties including significant losses, critical cashflow constraints, and imminent insolvency. The court exercised its cross-class cramdown jurisdiction to impose the plans on dissenting creditor classes, including multiple landlord creditor classes and business rates creditors. The court held that the primary jurisdictional preconditions were satisfied: the plan companies were companies liable to be wound up; they had encountered financial difficulties affecting their ability to carry on business as a going concern; the proposals constituted compromises or arrangements with the requisite element of give and take; and the purpose was to eliminate or mitigate the financial difficulties. The court found, among other things, that the relevant alternative was a value-destructive administration involving piecemeal sales of stock;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll