header-logo header-logo

16 June 2023
Issue: 8029 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 16 June 2023

Contempt

Ellis v His Majesty’s Solicitor General [2023] EWCA Civ 585, [2023] All ER (D) 04 (Jun)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellant’s appeal from a decision of a judge finding the appellant in contempt of court for breach of a general civil restraint order (GCRO) and sentencing him to 12 months’ imprisonment. The appellant was an ex-solicitor. He was apparently convinced that politicians, judges, the government, and the Ministry of Justice, together with all those who worked for them, were corrupt and that their decisions were, without exception, fraudulent. The appellant had acted and continued to act upon these beliefs. His modus operandi was to recruit innocent litigants, some with grievances against the justice system, some desperate for any help no matter the source, and others just bewildered by a process that they did not understand. The court found he was in contempt to the criminal standard and that the sentence imposed was proportionate. The appellant’s culpability was high. He had known what he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll