header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 17 December 2021

17 December 2021
Issue: 7961 / Categories: law reports , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Re AI M [2021] EWHC 303 (Fam), [2021] All ER (D) 112 (Jan)

The Family Division allowed the mother’s application for an additional legal services funding order of £643,000, in relation to an appeal which was listed to be heard in the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, concerning an earlier ruling, in proceedings concerning two children, on the question of whether the court had jurisdiction to investigate the acts of the state of the UAE and or Dubai. The court considered that, in circumstances where it had already determined that, irrespective of the assets the mother undoubtedly had at her disposal, the father should be funding her legal fees on an ongoing basis during the currency of the proceedings, it could see no distinction which would justify limiting its jurisdiction, so as to exclude funding of an appeal process. Further, the court held that it was either irrelevant, or certainly not determinative, that the Court of Appeal had a security for costs mechanism available to it, and that the father

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll