header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 18 & 25 April 2025

18 April 2025
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Barry and another v Barry [2025] EWHC 819 (KB)

This is a judgment on costs in the King’s Bench Division, following a trial in a family contractual dispute between parents and son over repayment of loans. The claimant parents succeeded in their claims against the defendant son and were awarded damages at trial. The key legal findings relate to the interpretation and application of Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules regarding offers to settle, particularly the consequences when a claimant beats their Part 36 offer, including entitlement to enhanced interest, costs on an indemnity basis, and an additional amount penalty.


Henderson & Jones Ltd v Salica Investments Ltd and others [2025] EWHC 838 (Comm)

This is an appeal following a judgment in favour of the claimant (litigation funder as assignee) against the first and fourth defendants for breach of confidence. The court awarded the claimant negotiating damages of £2,154,285 plus interest. The key issues decided were the validity of the claimant’s Part 36 offer, consequences of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll