header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 18 July 2025

Arbitration

The Republic of India v CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd (in administration) and other companies [2025] EWHC 1738 (Comm)

The King’s Bench Division heard an application regarding the joinder of parties to an arbitration claim and whether preliminary issues should be addressed before a substantive question of law under s 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The central point was whether the arbitral tribunal, seated in England, must exclusively apply Mauritian law to determine representation of the Mauritian companies involved. The tribunal had previously ruled that Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP could act on behalf of the Mauritian companies in arbitration despite contrary claims by an administrator appointed under Mauritian insolvency law. The court directed the determination of proposed preliminary issues as a case management measure. Further it was appropriate to add the Mauritian Companies ‘represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP on the instructions of the directors and shareholders of the said companies’ as interveners.


Building safety

Triathlon Homes LLP v Stratford Village Development Partnership and other companies [2025]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll