header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 18 July 2025

Arbitration

The Republic of India v CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd (in administration) and other companies [2025] EWHC 1738 (Comm)

The King’s Bench Division heard an application regarding the joinder of parties to an arbitration claim and whether preliminary issues should be addressed before a substantive question of law under s 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The central point was whether the arbitral tribunal, seated in England, must exclusively apply Mauritian law to determine representation of the Mauritian companies involved. The tribunal had previously ruled that Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP could act on behalf of the Mauritian companies in arbitration despite contrary claims by an administrator appointed under Mauritian insolvency law. The court directed the determination of proposed preliminary issues as a case management measure. Further it was appropriate to add the Mauritian Companies ‘represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP on the instructions of the directors and shareholders of the said companies’ as interveners.


Building safety

Triathlon Homes LLP v Stratford Village Development Partnership and other companies [2025]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll