header-logo header-logo

02 August 2024
Issue: 8082 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 2 August 2024

Bank

Riley and another v National Westminster Bank Plc [2024] EWCA Civ 833, [2024] All ER (D) 97 (Jul)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed an appeal by the appellant, directors of a building company, from a decision of the High Court that had granted the respondent bank reverse summary judgment on the appellants’ claim against the bank for fraudulent misrepresentation. The appellants were the directors of a building development company, RHL. The respondent bank gave secure loans to RHL. The bank later transferred management of RHL’s loans to its Global Restructuring Group (GRG). The appellants contended that that involved wrongdoing by the bank. The parties entered into a settlement deed under which the appellants paid a reduced sum to settle all claims against the bank related to RHL. Later the appellants brought a claim alleging that the bank had made fraudulent misrepresentations about its intentions regarding RHL, based in part on new information. The bank denied the claim. The judge decided that the claims against the bank had been compromised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll