header-logo header-logo

02 August 2024
Issue: 8082 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 2 August 2024

Bank

Riley and another v National Westminster Bank Plc [2024] EWCA Civ 833, [2024] All ER (D) 97 (Jul)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed an appeal by the appellant, directors of a building company, from a decision of the High Court that had granted the respondent bank reverse summary judgment on the appellants’ claim against the bank for fraudulent misrepresentation. The appellants were the directors of a building development company, RHL. The respondent bank gave secure loans to RHL. The bank later transferred management of RHL’s loans to its Global Restructuring Group (GRG). The appellants contended that that involved wrongdoing by the bank. The parties entered into a settlement deed under which the appellants paid a reduced sum to settle all claims against the bank related to RHL. Later the appellants brought a claim alleging that the bank had made fraudulent misrepresentations about its intentions regarding RHL, based in part on new information. The bank denied the claim. The judge decided that the claims against the bank had been compromised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll