header-logo header-logo

02 June 2023
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 2 June 2023

Costs

Forster v Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP [2023] EWHC 1150 (Ch), [2023] All ER (D) 59 (May)

The Chancery Division allowed the claimant’s claim. She had brought proceedings against her former solicitors, who had acted for her under a conditional fee arrangement, seeking damages for loss caused by alleged breaches of duty. The court held that the priorities of the conditional fee arrangement had been varied by agreement reached outside court. Further, the claimant had lost the chance to enforce a Tomlin order. That chance had been worth £192,500, and judgment would be entered in her favour for that sum.


Jurisdiction

A grantor v A grantee[2023] UKUT 23 (LC), [2023] All ER (D) 69 (May)

The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) considered whether it had jurisdiction to award costs in circumstances where it had acted as an arbitrator and had allowed the claimant landowner and grantor’s claim for compensation for ‘injurious affection’. The Upper Tribunal refused the respondent, the grantee’s, argument that the tribunal had had no jurisdiction to award

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll