header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 20 February 2026

Costs

R (on the application of ABB) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 61

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed ABB’s appeal against a costs order made by the Upper Tribunal following successful judicial review proceedings concerning a visa refusal. The Secretary of State for the Home Department had been ordered to pay 75% of ABB’s reasonable costs, but ABB appealed, arguing that he should be awarded his full costs. The key issue was whether the Upper Tribunal judge erred in reducing costs when ABB had achieved his primary remedy of entry clearance for 36 months. The court held that this was a category one case under the principles in R (M) v Croydon LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 595, where ABB was ‘wholly successful’ having obtained the visa he sought. The court found the secretary of state failed to discharge the heavy burden of justifying departure from the general rule that successful parties receive full costs, particularly where the secretary of state failed to comply

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll