header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 20 February 2026

Costs

R (on the application of ABB) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 61

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed ABB’s appeal against a costs order made by the Upper Tribunal following successful judicial review proceedings concerning a visa refusal. The Secretary of State for the Home Department had been ordered to pay 75% of ABB’s reasonable costs, but ABB appealed, arguing that he should be awarded his full costs. The key issue was whether the Upper Tribunal judge erred in reducing costs when ABB had achieved his primary remedy of entry clearance for 36 months. The court held that this was a category one case under the principles in R (M) v Croydon LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 595, where ABB was ‘wholly successful’ having obtained the visa he sought. The court found the secretary of state failed to discharge the heavy burden of justifying departure from the general rule that successful parties receive full costs, particularly where the secretary of state failed to comply

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll