header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 20 June 2025

20 June 2025
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

The Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process and Industrial Developments Ltd and another [2025] EWCA Civ 715

The Court of Appeal refused the application for permission to appeal by Mr Seamus Andrew, a solicitor and barrister, against findings made against him in the Commercial Court judgment. The findings concerned allegations of misconduct, including improper retention of the Federal Republic of Nigeria’s (FRN) privileged documents, during arbitration proceedings where Mr Andrew acted as counsel for Process & Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID). In dealing with two preliminary questions, the court held that the application for permission to appeal was out of time and should be refused on that ground alone; further, that the court did not have jurisdiction to entertain this application for permission to appeal, permission to appeal not having been obtained from the judge. Among other things, the judge ruled that the judge’s finding that Mr Andrew’s conduct in not stopping the use by P&ID of FRN internal legal documents and returning them to FRN was ‘indefensible’ was plainly correct.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll