header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 21 January 2022

21 January 2022
Issue: 7963 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

‘Maduro Board’ of the Central Bank of Venezuela v ‘Guaidó Board’ of the ­Central Bank of Venezuela [2021] UKSC 57, [2021] All ER (D) 72 (Dec)

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant’s appeal in part and dismissed the counter-appeal in proceedings concerning the effect of the disputed presidency of Venezuela. The respondent board favoured the previous president (M), while the appellant board favoured the interim president (G). Both sides claimed to act on behalf of the Central Bank of Venezuela, with regard to gold reserves held in the UK. The court held that declarations would be made that the UK Government (HMG) had, since 4 February 2019, recognised G as the constitutional interim President of Venezuela until credible presidential elections could be held. HMG had, since 4 February 2019, not recognised M as President of Venezuela for any purpose. Further, the proceedings would be remitted to the Commercial Court for it to consider whether the judgments of the Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal of Justice should be recognised or given effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll