header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 23 May 2025

23 May 2025
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Virgo Marine and another company v Reed Smith LLP and another company [2025] EWHC 1157 (Comm)

The Commercial Court ruled on the defendant law firm’s (RSUK’s) application for security for costs, concerning the claimants’ claim against it, arising out of a dispute concerning the purchase an oil tanker. The claim alleged: breach of contract, duty of care and fiduciary duty in giving the original instruction to a third party (Barclays) to freeze sums in escrow; and breach of contract in failing to pay the claimants the balance. The court held that it would not be just to make the order sought, despite the claimants being foreign companies and there being reason to believe they would be unable to pay RSUK’s costs, if ordered to do so. The court held that the argument that Barclays would resist making a payment from the balance to RSUK for the purposes of satisfying a costs order of the present court in RSUK’s favour appeared thin, and that its ability to resist such a payment was particularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll