header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 24 November 2023

Committal

Manchester City Council v Yusef and others [2023] EWHC 2792 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 63 (Nov)

The Family Division held that as the father was in breach of court orders, he was liable to be imprisoned for 12 months. The applicant Local authority had applied to commit the father to prison for breach of orders made by the court, with which it was alleged that father had, once again, failed to comply. The substantive proceedings concerned the father’s four children. The substantive application before the court was an application by the applicant for wardship orders in respect of the children and an order for summary return to the UK from the jurisdiction of Somalia. On the facts, the court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt, that the father was in breach of several court orders. With considerable regret, having regard to the father’s moving description of the impact his imprisonment had had on him, and in circumstances where the solution lay with the father complying with the orders, the appropriate custodial sentence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll