header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 24 November 2023

Committal

Manchester City Council v Yusef and others [2023] EWHC 2792 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 63 (Nov)

The Family Division held that as the father was in breach of court orders, he was liable to be imprisoned for 12 months. The applicant Local authority had applied to commit the father to prison for breach of orders made by the court, with which it was alleged that father had, once again, failed to comply. The substantive proceedings concerned the father’s four children. The substantive application before the court was an application by the applicant for wardship orders in respect of the children and an order for summary return to the UK from the jurisdiction of Somalia. On the facts, the court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt, that the father was in breach of several court orders. With considerable regret, having regard to the father’s moving description of the impact his imprisonment had had on him, and in circumstances where the solution lay with the father complying with the orders, the appropriate custodial sentence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll