header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 24 November 2023

Committal

Manchester City Council v Yusef and others [2023] EWHC 2792 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 63 (Nov)

The Family Division held that as the father was in breach of court orders, he was liable to be imprisoned for 12 months. The applicant Local authority had applied to commit the father to prison for breach of orders made by the court, with which it was alleged that father had, once again, failed to comply. The substantive proceedings concerned the father’s four children. The substantive application before the court was an application by the applicant for wardship orders in respect of the children and an order for summary return to the UK from the jurisdiction of Somalia. On the facts, the court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt, that the father was in breach of several court orders. With considerable regret, having regard to the father’s moving description of the impact his imprisonment had had on him, and in circumstances where the solution lay with the father complying with the orders, the appropriate custodial sentence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll