header-logo header-logo

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 27 May 2022

Damages

Storey v British Telecommunications plc [2022] EWCA Civ 616 [2022] All ER (D) 14 (May)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the County Court that granted summary judgment to the respondent. The appellant issued a claim against his then employer, the respondent, for damages and financial loss arising from personal injuries suffered in consequence of an accident at work. While the appellant was speaking to the customer, he was exposed to a sudden intense high-pitched crackling sound through the headset. The court held, among other things, that acoustic shock was different from, and unrelated to, noise-induced hearing loss, caused when people were exposed to sound that was loud enough to damage the ears. Acoustic shock could be caused at a level of noise well below that which presented a risk of noise-induced hearing loss, and the adverse impact could be due more to the pitch and acoustic pressure than to the sound level itself. Given the evidence that acoustic shock could occur at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll