header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 27 May 2022

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Damages

Storey v British Telecommunications plc [2022] EWCA Civ 616 [2022] All ER (D) 14 (May)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the County Court that granted summary judgment to the respondent. The appellant issued a claim against his then employer, the respondent, for damages and financial loss arising from personal injuries suffered in consequence of an accident at work. While the appellant was speaking to the customer, he was exposed to a sudden intense high-pitched crackling sound through the headset. The court held, among other things, that acoustic shock was different from, and unrelated to, noise-induced hearing loss, caused when people were exposed to sound that was loud enough to damage the ears. Acoustic shock could be caused at a level of noise well below that which presented a risk of noise-induced hearing loss, and the adverse impact could be due more to the pitch and acoustic pressure than to the sound level itself. Given the evidence that acoustic shock could occur at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll