header-logo header-logo

29 March 2024
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 29 March & 5 April 2024

Compensation

R (on the application of AXO (a child) (by her litigation friend)) v First- Tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) and another [2024] EWCA Civ 226, [2024] All ER (D) 74 (Mar)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on the appellant’s appeal against the UT’s decision to permit the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) to reclaim a settlement award. The appellant’s mother had been subjected to domestic abuse by her ex-partner. The appellant was five years old when her mother was murdered by her ex-partner. The appellant had been awarded by the CICA for compensation. The appellant sought damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 against three state agencies for breach of arts 2 and 3 of the ECHR. The state defendants offered to settle for £15,000, with £10,000 of that amount related to the appellant’s claim for breach of art 2 and £5,000 for breach of art 3. CICA sought repayment of part of the CICA compensation out of the HRA damages asserting that the HRA damages had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll