header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 29 September 2023

29 September 2023
Issue: 8042 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

International Game Technology PLC and other companies v Gambling Commission [2023] EWHC 2226 (TCC), [2023] All ER (D) 32 (Sep)

The Technology and Construction Court dismissed permission to appeal by the claimants’ (together, IGT) and made a cost order against them in favour of the defendant Gambling Commission (the Commission) and the interested parties (together, Allwyn). The preliminary issues had been decided in favour of the Commission and it had been concluded that IGT had no standing to challenge the Commission’s award to Allwyn of the licence to run the Fourth National Lottery. The present matter addressed consequential matters. It fell to be determined whether (i) the Commission should have been awarded its claim against IGT for the cost of the claims and for a payment on account of those costs; (ii) Allwyn should be granted an order that IGT should pay their costs and; (iii) IGT’s application for permission to appeal should be granted. The court held that (i) an amount had to be identified and paid on account rather

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll