header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 29 September 2023

29 September 2023
Issue: 8042 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

International Game Technology PLC and other companies v Gambling Commission [2023] EWHC 2226 (TCC), [2023] All ER (D) 32 (Sep)

The Technology and Construction Court dismissed permission to appeal by the claimants’ (together, IGT) and made a cost order against them in favour of the defendant Gambling Commission (the Commission) and the interested parties (together, Allwyn). The preliminary issues had been decided in favour of the Commission and it had been concluded that IGT had no standing to challenge the Commission’s award to Allwyn of the licence to run the Fourth National Lottery. The present matter addressed consequential matters. It fell to be determined whether (i) the Commission should have been awarded its claim against IGT for the cost of the claims and for a payment on account of those costs; (ii) Allwyn should be granted an order that IGT should pay their costs and; (iii) IGT’s application for permission to appeal should be granted. The court held that (i) an amount had to be identified and paid on account rather

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll