header-logo header-logo

30 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 30 September 2022

Coroner

Davison v HM Senior Coroner for Hertfordshire [2022] EWHC 2343 (Admin), [2022] All ER (D) 25 (Sep)

The Administrative Court, first, allowed the claim for an order, under s 13 of the Coroners Act 1988, to quash the defendant coroner’s conclusion that the claimant’s daughter had taken her own life. At the time of her death, the claimant’s daughter had been receiving outpatient treatment for her diabulimia, a rare eating disorder which causes people with type 1 diabetes to omit insulin, from one of the interested party’s consultant psychiatrists and its Community Eating Disorder Service. Among other things, the court held that the discovery of new evidence, a report by an expert in diabulimia (the report), had meant that it was necessary and desirable in the interests of justice for a fresh investigation to be held. The report had demonstrated that there was public interest in more being known about diabulimia, given that it had indicated that: (i) the condition was more widespread than commonly recognised; (ii) better coordination between different disciplines

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll