header-logo header-logo

05 August 2022
Issue: 7990 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 5 August 2022

Company

Offical Receiver v Obaigbena [2022] EWHC 1399 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 63 (Jul)

The Chancery Division dismissed the appeal of the appellant from a decision of the deputy insolvency and companies court which disqualified the appellant from being involved in the management of a limited company. The appellant argued that (i) the judge had applied the wrong legal test by failing to consider and decide whether the appellant had known or ought to had known that there was no reasonable prospect of creditors being paid or of the company avoiding insolvent liquidation; and (ii) that the judge erred in disqualifying the appellant for a period of seven years. The court held, among other things, that the judge did not err in law by failing to apply a ‘legal test’. The court had not considered that that legal test was required by s 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. Further, although a period of seven years was at the upper limit of what could be a reasonable exercise of discretion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll