header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 5 August 2022

05 August 2022
Issue: 7990 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company

Offical Receiver v Obaigbena [2022] EWHC 1399 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 63 (Jul)

The Chancery Division dismissed the appeal of the appellant from a decision of the deputy insolvency and companies court which disqualified the appellant from being involved in the management of a limited company. The appellant argued that (i) the judge had applied the wrong legal test by failing to consider and decide whether the appellant had known or ought to had known that there was no reasonable prospect of creditors being paid or of the company avoiding insolvent liquidation; and (ii) that the judge erred in disqualifying the appellant for a period of seven years. The court held, among other things, that the judge did not err in law by failing to apply a ‘legal test’. The court had not considered that that legal test was required by s 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. Further, although a period of seven years was at the upper limit of what could be a reasonable exercise of discretion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll