header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 6 September 2024

06 September 2024
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Human rights

QX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] UKSC 26, [2024] All ER (D) 08 (Aug)

The Supreme Court dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, that Art 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) applied to the review of the Secretary of State’s decision made under s 2 of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 where conditions A and B were met therein when the temporary exclusion order (TEO) was imposed against the appellant (the imposition review) on the basis that it would be directly determinative of the respondent’s civil rights. The respondent was therefore entitled to a level of disclosure of the evidence relied on by the Home Secretary in support of its allegations of terrorism-related activity in Syria which complied with Art 6(1) of the Convention. The Secretary of State submitted that, depending on the content of the closed national security material, it was possible that the same form of open words would be sufficient

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll