header-logo header-logo

07 August 2026
Issue: 8173 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 7 August 2026

Costs

R (on the application of the Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission [2026] EWCA Civ 992

The Court of Appeal dismissed H7 and H15’s appeal against the Divisional Court’s decision that the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) had no power to award costs in review proceedings. The case arose from SIAC’s decision in FGF’s case that it had jurisdiction to award costs when the home secretary withdrew a naturalisation decision. The home secretary brought judicial review proceedings against SIAC to quash that decision. H7 and H15, who had their own pending costs applications before SIAC, were joined as interested parties. The Divisional Court quashed SIAC’s decision and declared that SIAC lacked power to award costs in review cases under ss 2C-2F of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 (the 1997 Act). The issue was whether SIAC has the power under s 2D of the 1997 Act to award costs in review proceedings. The Court of Appeal held that ss 2D(3) and (4) of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll