header-logo header-logo

07 November 2025
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 7 November 2025

Elections

Moore v Royal Mail Group Ltd and others [2025] EWCA Civ 1378

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed an appeal against the Divisional Court’s refusal to dismiss an election petition. What is at issue is whether an election petition presented by the respondent Mr Graham Moore should be dismissed because it failed to give information required by the Election Petition Rules 1960 (the 1960 Rules) and/or was not duly served. The Divisional Court concluded that the trial of the petition should proceed. That decision is challenged by the appellants Ms Sarah Pochin (the candidate declared to have been elected) and Mr Stephen Young (the returning officer). While the court found that a petition should state the date of return to the Clerk of the Crown (answering the first issue affirmatively), it held that Parliament did not intend this omission to invalidate the petition in these circumstances where no prejudice had occurred. The court also held that CPR 6.15(2) empowers courts to retrospectively validate steps taken to serve an election petition within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll