header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 7 November 2025

07 November 2025
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Elections

Moore v Royal Mail Group Ltd and others [2025] EWCA Civ 1378

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed an appeal against the Divisional Court’s refusal to dismiss an election petition. What is at issue is whether an election petition presented by the respondent Mr Graham Moore should be dismissed because it failed to give information required by the Election Petition Rules 1960 (the 1960 Rules) and/or was not duly served. The Divisional Court concluded that the trial of the petition should proceed. That decision is challenged by the appellants Ms Sarah Pochin (the candidate declared to have been elected) and Mr Stephen Young (the returning officer). While the court found that a petition should state the date of return to the Clerk of the Crown (answering the first issue affirmatively), it held that Parliament did not intend this omission to invalidate the petition in these circumstances where no prejudice had occurred. The court also held that CPR 6.15(2) empowers courts to retrospectively validate steps taken to serve an election petition within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll