header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 9 July 2021

09 July 2021
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Betamax Ltd v State Trading Corp (Mauritius) [2021] UKPC 14, [2021] All ER (D) 77 (Jun)

On an appeal from the Supreme Court of Mauritius, the appellant company submitted that the court had erred in finding that an arbitrator had erred in its determination of the legality of the contract that the appellant was seeking to enforce. The Privy Council, directing that the appeal be allowed, held that the Supreme Court was in error in reviewing the decision of the arbitrator that the contract was unenforceable on public law grounds; the arbitrator’s decision was final and binding on the parties and therefore no issue arose as to whether the award was in conflict with the public policy of Mauritius


Costs

Re Moskalev Moskalev v Yanishevskiy [2021] EWHC 1575 (Ch), [2021] All ER (D) 65 (Jun)

In proceedings to determine what, if any, order on costs should be made in respect of an application to set aside a statutory demand, following the respondent’s withdrawal of the demand, the Chancery Division

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll